“The NAC proposals [are] a great victory for the government — they allow it to appear to be doing something radical for food security, but it is actually more of the same,” he said.
In the United Progressive Alliance’s first tenure, when the Sonia Gandhi-led NAC was formed, Dr. Drèze played a critical role in the formulation of two of its most important programmes — the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme and the path-breaking Right to Information Act. He, however, quit halfway through his tenure as he felt that the NAC was not radical enough.
According to Dr. Drèze, the NAC “began its deliberations on a visionary note” but later came under a lot of pressure to accommodate constraints imposed by the government. The final result, he says, is “a minimalist proposal that misses many important elements of food security.” He feels the Public Distribution System (PDS) framework is “very fragmented and fails to abolish the artificial distinction between APL and BPL households” while adding that it “takes on board food procurement limits that reflect the government’s reluctance to expand the PDS over objective constraints.”
“Non-PDS entitlements have been diluted beyond recognition. Entire fields of intervention that are crucial for food security [such as child development services and old age pensions] have been left out of the final proposals,” he points out.